Hello
There 3 batch of patches depending of one another :
- Bug 8962 is formally dependant of 11202, and I don't want to rewrite
it without the dependancy
- It is not formally dependant of 11291, but before writing the "DOM"
patches of 8962, I prefer to see the mechanism proposed in bug 11291
tested pushed into master, before adapting it for 8962
So I won't wrote the DOM patches for Bug 8962 before
- bugs 11202 and 11291 are be signed off, qaed and push into master
and
- Bug 8962 has received at least a signed off for the 3 patches
currently attached (made for GRS1).
I think I will have some free hours to work on that in december or
january, but probably not after.
Regards,
M. Saby
Le 25/11/2013 08:46, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
The question is : is it good or not to have a way to find information
anywhere in a record, really anywhere, whatever the field or subfield?
I would favor: anywhere=all specific indexes. "Really anywhere" will cost more
and will
perhaps index fields that you do not even want to index.
It should always be possible to exclude a field from indexing.
In fact it raises a second question: even if it is usefull for staff to
have a broad (on all specific indexes) or even a broader (on all fields
of the record) index, it is a good thing that this index is used in OPAC
simple search ?
I believe not. Because some data are not made to be searched by an
average user, and can even make a precise search on a subject more
difficult.
I agree.
--
Mathieu Saby
Service d'Informatique Documentaire
Service Commun de Documentation
Université Rennes 2
Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65
Courriel : mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
