On 2012-03-9, at 10:16 PM, Marcel de Rooy wrote: > +1 for a gradual perl tidy too
+1 to a gradual perltidy from me too > > So, best to keep cleaning up incrementally, I think.A As we move from C4 > > to Koha, that'll be an opportunity to clean up all the modules > > > > -Ian > > > > 2012/3/8 Jared Camins-Esakov <jcam...@cpbibliography.com> > > > > +1 to a gradual perltidy > > > > 2012/3/8 Fischer, Katrin <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> > > > > I agree with Chris C. and Chris N. - I think what we would win does > > not outweigh the loss of history. > > > > Katrin > > > > 2012/3/8 Chris Cormack <ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz> > > > > > My counter proposal is tidy as you go. Fix code as you touch it. > > > > > > With vim (and other editors) you can easily tidy a block, doing > > that > > as > > > code is changed would be my preference. > > > > > > > I'd prefer a "pay-as-you-go" approach as well. We could simply > > require > > all > > work to be tidied before submitting. > > > > Slow? Yes, but not nearly as messy and preserves the history. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Chris > >
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
