On Mar 9, 2012 6:41 AM, "Paul Poulain" <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> wrote: > > Le 08/03/2012 18:30, Chris Cormack a écrit : > > > Doing it in one hit only makes this better if it is possible to have git > > blame ignore this commit. > > I don't think it's possible. > > > I just want to go on record as disagreeing with this plan. But happy to > > abide by community decision I just reserve the right to complain :-) > > Well, speaking with Katrin, it seems the decision was not that clear: > http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2012-01-04#i_857956 > > I'm OK to discuss of it again, but I'd like to have counter proposals. > And if we can't find an option that please everyone, then maybe do > nothing, and remove the rule from the coding guidelines and never > complain again or start a discussion about that (not speaking of new > files here, just existing ones) > My counter proposal is tidy as you go. Fix code as you touch it.
With vim (and other editors) you can easily tidy a block, doing that as code is changed would be my preference. Chris > I made a list of pro and cons of the "big bang" option, feel free > (everybody) to add another suggestion or complete my pro/cons list > > (note: this encouragement is not for chris C. only, but for everybody) > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
