Hi to all, Il 09/01/2012 15:55, Galen Charlton ha scritto:
> Could you elaborate more on the use case this would support? The > framework code is displayed in the bib editor, for example, which is one > point where a cataloger would need to know about it. Adding it to the > MARC framework would make it available for searching and make it a > little more convenient to display the framework code in XSLT OPAC > displays -- but to what end? oh, is quite simple. I want to export data in marc format to import in an other Koha and I use different frameworks to catalogue. If I insertr biblio.frameworkcode, I can re-import records in different frameworks. Clearly I need to setup 'marc to Koha links' before to import with bulkmarcimport.pl > For MARC21 frameworks, if we were add to this to the default framework, > I'd prefer that the 942 or the 999 be used, as those are already > supported for bib-level mappings -- no need to carve out another tag. Well, in theory 999 are repetable, 942 is not repetable. So for me is better 942. A new subfield or we re-use $a ? The subfield used are [default framework]: -- 942 0 Koha issues (borrowed), 2 Source of classification or shelving scheme 6 Koha normalized classification for sorting a Institution code [OBSOLETE] c Koha [default] item type e Edition h Classification part i Item part k Call number prefix m Call number suffix n Suppress in OPAC s Serial record flag Bye Zeno Tajoli -- Dott. Zeno Tajoli tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it fax +39 02 2135520 CILEA - Consorzio Interuniversitario http://www.cilea.it/disclaimer _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
