On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Bob Birchall <b...@calyx.net.au> wrote:
> How about this approach: > - we designate a very small number of companies with the capacity and track > record of major feature integration, as being authorised to short cut > community QA before integrating major features (only); > > - minor features and bug fixes remain subject to the existing work flow; Minor features and bug fixes are less likely to break something than major features. It is precisely *because* some of the features pending signoff are so large and broadly-scoped that it is difficult to properly test them. Part of becoming more "agile," if we must use that term, is to learn to keep our contributions manageable and feature-specific. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
