On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Paul Poulain <[email protected]>wrote:
> Le 10/04/2011 22:42, Chris Cormack a écrit : > > Hi All > Hi All too, > > There may be a need for people to convert a template to > > template::toolkit so they can send a patch that will apply cleanly. > thinking of it, there is another problem: we have patches pending that > contains H::T::P parts (see patches to sign-off on bugzilla...) . How > will we deal with them for 3.4/3.6 > The same question arises for 3.2 fixes : should we submit 2 patches : > one for H::T::P, one for TT ? just one for HTP or TT, at your option, > RM(aint) take care of the switch to T::T ? > > Speaking as RMaint, I would prefer that template which apply to maintenance branches be submitted which cleanly apply to that branch. So that would mean supplying patches against templates which use H::T::P in that format, and patches against templates using T::T in that format. The rate at which cleanly applying patches will show up in maintenance releases will be much faster than those which do not cleanly apply. Kind Regards, Chris
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
