https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42639
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off --- Comment #17 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #16) > (In reply to Bo Gustavsson from comment #15) > > (In reply to David Nind from comment #14) > > > I've signed off, but I do have a question. > > > > > > Should "None specified" be a valid option? > > > > > > Before the patch, if "None specified" is selected, there is no value in > > > the > > > database for the sex field. > > > > > > After the patch, you can't choose "None specified". > > > > I don’t think “None specified” should be selectable. I find it more > > intuitive than having it pre-filled when it isn’t an allowed option. > > > > “None specified” is, of course, selectable and should be the default value > > when “Gender (sex)” is not marked as required. > > I disagree. It's possible to select "none specified" now and it's a valid > option for us if a patron chooses not to disclose that information. Other is > used for "divers" in German, so not a replacement here. This change of > behavior would cause problems for a lot of libraries. Hm, maybe things are different when you are making the field mandatory. Sorry, it's early here still and my brain is just warming up. As there is no other way to unselect, it would make sense for that use case. As long as it stays selectable for non-mandatory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
