https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38142
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |additional_work_needed --- Comment #11 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- This might work for MARC21, but I don't think it should: In MARC21 the 1xx fields are all marked as non-repeatable. And Koha's frameworks for MARC21 reflect that: https://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ad1xx3xx.html And the $7 is used otherwise: $7 - Data provenance (R) As we usually expect the 1xx to not be repeated I am not sure what kind of problems could arise if it is. It looks like in UNIMARC authority this is OK: https://repository.ifla.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3a3df76b-dad8-4a41-95ee-5198813784fa/content 1) I feel we should mark this as a UNIMARC feature in the system preference text. (please argue strongly or follow-up) 2) I am not sure if "reported" is clear here as the verb in both the system preference name and description. It's more like it will be the one that is used/copied to the bibliographic record if I understand correctly? (question to native speakers). (not a blocker, but might confuse translators?) 3) Please use say_success in your database updates... fixed before pushing (done) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
