http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #41 from Nuño López Ansótegui <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #39) > (In reply to comment #36) > > > I am wondering if it is dangerous to set the plugin for one framework and > > > not for another (could be the case)? > > Since your pref is OFF by default, this is initially harmless. > Suppose however that people have some frameworks, and some frameworks have a > 001 plugin and other frameworks have not. (Not recommended of course..) > > They upgrade and now some frameworks have your plugin and others have the > old (custom) one. They are perhaps not aware of this incosistency. At some > time they activate your pref and they see your plugin in some framework, > making the wrong conclusion that all frameworks already have it. From that > time on, we do have a problem. > > Now is the question: Should we actually update a Koha db that has this > inconsistency with potential for future problems, or should we only update > if all frameworks do NOT have a 001 plugin? If they have their own 001 plugin, i think that they should be able to control their frameworks and differ if they have the default plugin 001 in Koha or not. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
