https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34482
--- Comment #9 from Eric Phetteplace <[email protected]> --- Hi, Katrin! Yes, we have an OCLC number in 001 for most of our records, I was sort of writing in shorthand for that. I would like to be able to use a URL in $w or I suppose $o (other record identifier) or else use a biblionumber. I'm not sure if we've set precedence for biblionumber as a record control number anywhere? Like would something like $w(koha)1234 make sense? Examples: 776 0 8 $iOnline version:$tHamlet$ohttps://example.com renders as => Online version: <a href="https://example.com";>Hamlet</a> 776 0 8 $iOnline version:$tHamlet$w(koha)1234 renders as => Online version: <a href="/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=1234">Hamlet</a> The latter seems maybe a bit weird in that there's no fitting choice of organizational code to prefix the biblionumber with. But with the ability to use a URL one could at least use a link to one's own catalog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
