https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36466
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |rel_22_11_candidate, | |rel_23_05_candidate, | |rel_23_11_candidate, | |rel_24_05_candidate Status|Passed QA |Failed QA --- Comment #12 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- I can confirm that we have been seeing these issues especially with "irregular" patterns where the next issue date is empty and should be empty in 22.11. We have quite an issue there right now as libraries are forced to set the "next issue publication" date to work around the error 500. (In reply to Nick Clemens (kidclamp) from comment #10) > Moving from enhancement > > Passing QA, but leaving a question for RM: > The atomicupdate sets the dates to NULL, which is valid > The code now sets blank dates to TODAY - is this correct? Or should it just > be NULL? I believe at least for the irregular patterns this doesn't feel correct. We want to have the published and expected dates as NULL for these. The database update looks correct to me. Could we get a tiny follow-up here if you agree? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
