http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9834
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- The itemnumber is kept as a 'better safe than sorry' approach. That is, it is better to make sure the patron gets exactly the item they wanted rather than risk giving the patron an item he or she didn't want. I think the solution is to just add a new field 'hold_level' to the reserves table that is marked as 'bib' or 'item' when a reserve is first placed. That way we can know at the time of reversion if we need to remove the itemnumber or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
