http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7688
--- Comment #67 from Paul Poulain <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #66) > For me it's very very good. I suppose that someone with more experience or > data in subscriptions could test more extensively. Just FYI, this dev is in production on a 3.2 since something like 18 months. Things had to be rewritten to T::T, that's why the library had not signed-off itself. But the feature is working well, and if you signoff, I think we can move to QA without another signoff. > Without these corrections is guaranteed to go "Failed QA", and it would be a > shame. Agreed ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
