http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8367
--- Comment #28 from M. de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #25) > Hm, there is a downside to the new column too - we loose a bit of > flexibility. Say a library closes for some time and changes the pickup delay > to be longer, so the holds don't go stale - with the patch in effect they > would have to do a database update to those holds. It's only one use case I > have come up with so far. There might be other disadvantages/advantages of > both ways of doing it. What is Koha doing if I adjust the loan period? It does not change the due dates in the system. The due date was set with the active guidelines of that moment. You could say: Doing the same for holds is consistent :) If the library closes, they should stop confirming holds in due time, limiting the number of waiting holds. Pending holds are no problem. The pickup date should be calculated at confirm hold time. They could also stop the cron job for cancelling holds until they processed the holds queue after reopening? Would they really need a db update? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
