http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9407

--- Comment #6 from MJ Ray (software.coop) <[email protected]> ---
That change makes the code easier to read for now, but would have to be changed
to something like the perlfaq4 idiom I used if C4::Patrons::Search (and
C4::SQLHelper::SearchInTable) gains other possible values that we want to
allow, or if someone chooses to add the currently-supported "exact" type. 
Should I add a comment to note that I'm using the perlfaq4 idiom to ease future
expansion, or use the simpler form for now?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to