https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #8 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #2) > I don't know what to do. I have the feeling that what Ulrich is suggesting > is not the right thing as we are using the "Full name <email@domain>" format > for a while (bug 3280) now. > > On the other hand removing the validation seems bad as well. > > Adding a split in Koha::Email is not optimal (we could search for "<>" and > pass that to Email::Valid instead of the whole replyto string). > > Any good other suggestions, Tomas? I would like to add that if this solution based on Email::Address moves forward, I would like to make sure we don't build addresses manually, but pass Email::Address objects around instead. Or Koha::Email::Address objects if we wanted to do something Koha-ish on the addresses. I really like the library and the stringification it does. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
