http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8996
M. de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #4 from M. de Rooy <[email protected]> --- QA Comment: I would agree with your second adjustment on line 1840 (removing the >0 condition, including negative notforloan). I am not sure about your first adjustment on line 1802 (changing ==-1 to <0 ). As I understand, a negative notforloan value does not immediately imply that the item is on order. Historically, the value of -1 means on order, although someone could change or remove the authvalue. (In that case he would be hindered by the hardcoded -1 tests in code..) But where do we say that -2 means on order too? Please clarify or correct me where my conclusion seems wrong. Changing status to reflect need of clarification. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
