http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8879
M. Tompsett <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from M. Tompsett <[email protected]> --- I saw some of these and were annoyed by them. I was pondering if perhaps it would be okay to change INIT to CHECK, as there is only one INIT and no CHECK blocks, so LIFO vs. FIFO doesn't really matter, would be an adequate solution for the first two (http://perldoc.perl.org/perlmod.html#BEGIN,-UNITCHECK,-CHECK,-INIT-and-END). I think I have something for the Labels. I'll post up my patch for the Labels later. Basically the patch is just initializing everything to 0 if they aren't defined. Seeing as this a test, I don't think a rectangle of 0,0,0,0 is going to be much of a problem. And if it is passed at runtime, a rectangle of 0,0,0,0 will likely not print something that should be or print it incorrectly, which will trigger someone finding the bad code that called it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
