http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7417
--- Comment #21 from Chris Cormack <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > > > > But I think using Class::Accessor is not what we want. We should (re)rewrite > > modules using it. > > > I disagree, I think we should rewrite modules using Moose. But mostly, I > don't care, working code that is clean and passes tests is much more > important, so far the code in Koha:: using Class::Accessor does this, the > code using Moose ..... Heh I realise now this isn't clear, I mean we shouldn't rewrite any modules, but if were to rewrite some. I would pick the ones already written in Moose as good candidates for a rewrite as those are the ones that are causing problems. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
