http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
--- Comment #109 from Chris Nighswonger <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #107) > If there are true QA-related comments, we will deal with them. But please, > stop adding requirements to this patch. Or we will abandon it, it will not > be pushed and we will stick with the current updatedatabase mechanism. I must say that this sounds a bit like coercion. At the least it carries a bad tone and is not what I would call constructive. I understand the concern (I think) but strongly object to the language of the above paragraph in particular. Jonathan, himself, asked for more discussion: "Perhaps, somebody else can given his opinion and open the discussion." Several of us have obliged him. Quite frankly, you can take it or leave it. You (Paul) are the RM and have the full liberty to push or drop any given work. The three of us who have commented in response to Jonathan's request hardly represent the majority of the community. Quite obviously this work functions and does the job regardless of the outstanding objections/reservations. If the technical objections of the QA person have been met and you feel the work is sound, by all means push it. Just please do not resort to the sort of language which really serves only to intimidate. (I know... we all get frustrated. We just have to get over it and move forward.) <tone>typed with a smile and the kindest of intentions</tone> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
