https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21203
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #2) > QA Comment: Can we 100% guarantee that there is always 1 and only 1 > biblioitem attached to a biblio object? > > Looking at the dbic schema it appears there's no db level constraint for > this (it's a has_many relationship), looking a level up in the Koha::Biblio > object it appears we do indeed fire a ->find rather than using the > underlying dbic relationship, which suggests there's only 1 (or 0) > biblioitem attached to a biblio but there's no test to confirm we actually > get a biblioitem object back. > > I'd love to see the underlying db constraints added, but would accept a > second check that the biblioitem exists before calling unblessed upon it. > > Perhaps I'm being over cautious? I do not think this is valid, biblio and biblioitem must be considered 1-1, we discussed it several times on the mailing lists. Both tables must be merged, but it's a huge work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
