https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17519
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion --- Comment #15 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- Actually no - I just didn't have the time to write another answer. I think this patch makes the behaviour inconsistent. If you can empty out on editing, but not on adding the item - that will look like a bug. The behaviour right now is consistent as the field is forced to be mandatory and as I said, we rely on this in some contexts - for example in context of inventory books. Maybe we should discuss use cases first? Things that come to my mind: - new books list - inventory book (electronical, sometimes printed out) - sorting by accession date in the OPAC - weeding reports/workflows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
