http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4530
Srdjan Jankovic <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |In Discussion --- Comment #22 from Srdjan Jankovic <[email protected]> 2012-02-19 23:22:58 UTC --- > > === point 1 (and a question) === > (In reply to comment #3) > > More comprehensive description of rule selection: > > * Rules are chosen in order of preference borrower category, item type, > > branch > > * If value for certain rule is null, next rule in order is chosen > > * 0 is treated as null > > does it mean that, if I set the general rule to 7 documents for 21 days, and > set a rule for > CHILDREN / DVD to 0 it will be treated as NULL and the general rule will be > applied ? > If yes, it's a big change in the behaviour, and, imo, a big mistake = > libraries > want to define such rules. > 0 should mean 0. I agree we should handle "empty" as "rule unused at this > level" I agree, it is just how it was before, so I did not want to change that. Please advise best course of action. > > === point 4 === > small point : SQL must have reserved words in capital > so > ." ORDER BY branchcode DESC, categorycode DESC, itemtype DESC"; > and not > ." order by branchcode desc, categorycode desc, itemtype desc"; Probably used some of the existing code, but will change that, it's not a big issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
