On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:13 PM Steven A. Falco <stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would still be helpful if the doc repo could be tagged at the same point > that everything else is tagged, because every single Fedora package needs a > correct version in its name. For example, it would be very strange (perhaps > "illegal") to package something called the 6.0.1 doc that came from some > random SHA in an untagged tree. I don't understand why this discussion is so difficult to understand. I agree with Jon and don't see any problem for distros. As far as I can see the point is that the documentation package version shouldn't be logically dependent on the KiCad packages or vice versa. You can have package kicad-v6.0-documentation version, say, 20222001 [date], can't you? You don't have to give it the version number 6.0.x. If a git tag is needed for technical reasons, let's have automatic tagging which adds a tag each day. Eeli Kaikkonen _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
