su 13. lokak. 2019 klo 4.10 Strontium (strnty...@gmail.com) kirjoitti: > My 2c > > "As Designed" should be the only answer.
[...] > "Invalid" and "Not a Bug" cut off continued dialogue > and look dogmatic/arrogant. > On the other hand I have reported situations which I couldn't reproduce later. The "bug" description didn't actually describe KiCad's behavior. In that case Not a Bug would be more accurate. "As Designed" would be accurate where the bug description actually descibes the behavior, but it's intented. "Triaged" really isn't good. Launchpad explanation list have these descriptions: - > Confirmed: Verified by someone other than the reporter. - > Triaged: Verified by the bug supervisor. But "verified" isn't a good word for wishlist items, and who is a "bug supervisor"? Instead there could be something like "accepted, but not planned" for wishlist items which would mean that the (core) developers or people who can otherwise decide what is basically acceptable have accepted the basic idea and if someone - possibly a new developer - wants to implement it, it could be done (at least after further detailed discussion). It would imply that it has so low priority that it probably won't be implemented by the current development team, although anyone can take it under work later. That would give positive and meaningful signal for the reporter and for potential implementors: yes, a good idea, and if you want to implement it, it's safe to go on. Eeli Kaikkonen
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
