Should be fixed now…. > On 10 Sep 2019, at 10:19, Simon Richter <simon.rich...@hogyros.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > we have three new test failures[1] (same test, with different internal units): > > - Common.library.module.tests.Segment > > [Error] - check SegCollideCorrect( c.m_seg_a, c.m_seg_b, c.m_clearance, > c.m_exp_coll ) has failed for ( [ [ 0 | 0 ] - [ 10 | 0 ] ], [ [ 0 | 10 ] - [ > 10 | 10 ] ], 10, false )Parallel, 10 apart, 10 clearCollision incorrect: > expected 0, got 1 > == [File] - > /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/linux-kicad-head/src/qa/common/geometry/test_segment.cpp > == [Line] - 360 > == [Context] Parallel, 10 apart, 10 clear > == [Context] Collision incorrect: expected 0, got 1 > [Error] - check SegCollideCorrect( c.m_seg_a, c.m_seg_b, c.m_clearance, > c.m_exp_coll ) has failed for ( [ [ 0 | -10 ] - [ 0 | 0 ] ], [ [ -20 | 0 ] - > [ -2 | 0 ] ], 2, false )T-junction, 2 apart, 2 clearCollision incorrect: > expected 0, got 1 > == [File] - > /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/linux-kicad-head/src/qa/common/geometry/test_segment.cpp > == [Line] - 360 > == [Context] T-junction, 2 apart, 2 clear > == [Context] Collision incorrect: expected 0, got 1 > > This was introduced[2] by one of > > Fix zero failure in SEG::PointCloserThan(). — jeff > Performance enhancement. — jeff > > Simon > > [1] https://jenkins.simonrichter.eu/job/linux-kicad-head/3603/testReport/ > [2] https://jenkins.simonrichter.eu/job/linux-kicad-head/3603/changes > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
