I went with something similar to Seth’s proposal, only based on Eeschema’s find (so no regular expressions yet).
Most of the workings are down in EDA_ITEM, so if we add regex matching we’ll get it in both Eeschema and Pcbnew. Cheers, Jeff. > On 26 Jul 2019, at 13:11, Seth Hillbrand <s...@hillbrand.org> wrote: > > On 2019-07-26 14:39, Jeff Young wrote: >> PCBNew’s current Find does a match against the whole string. I think >> it would be more intuitive with a ‘*’ in front and back of the search >> string (so that it finds partial matches). >> Any other opinions? >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > Hi Jeff- > > Here's a mockup of something I was poking at a while ago. Different > processing for different purposes. As long as we remember the checkboxes > between uses, people's search preferences are allowed/respected. > > -Seth<FindWindow.png> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
