This makes a lot more sense. I agree that the spoke width should be allowed to be the same as the minimum copper width. It just cannot be less.
On 7/8/19 3:30 PM, Jeff Young wrote: > Ahh, now I understand where I wasn’t clear. Yes, Seth is correct: I’m trying > to allow them to have the same value, not to be the same property. > >> On 8 Jul 2019, at 20:04, Seth Hillbrand <s...@hillbrand.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Wayne- >> >> I don't think Jeff is suggesting that the parameters be combined, just that >> we should allow the spokes to be the same width as the minimum width. >> >> Jeff, is that correct? >> >> -Seth >> >> On 2019-07-08 09:40, Jeff Young wrote: >>> We enforce minimum width by deflating the zone by 1/2-min-width, >>> simplifying the polygons, and then re-inflating by the same amount. >>> If the spokes are the same width as the minimum, they will disappear. >>>> On 8 Jul 2019, at 13:57, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Isn't the thermal spoke width a different setting than the minimum >>>> width? I'm under the impression that these two zone properties control >>>> completely different aspects of the zone fill and have no impact on the >>>> other. >>>> On 7/7/2019 5:01 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: >>>>> We've done this a few times already with zones. As long as the existing >>>>> fills don't change, we've left the property. Refilling is expected to >>>>> change, I think. >>>>> I'd be in favor of allowing min width to mean min width. >>>>> -Seth >>>>> On 2019-07-07 16:08, Jeff Young wrote: >>>>>> We have a zone property “Minimum Width”. Unfortunately, it isn’t. >>>>>> It’s the width we’ll collapse (so minimum width would be 1nm more). >>>>>> I’d be inclined to fix this (primarily so that thermal spokes and >>>>>> minimum width could be the same), but then we have the old “will >>>>>> change old boards” issue. >>>>>> We could also try and change the property name, but I can’t think of a >>>>>> concise way to express “remove features this width and less”. >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Jeff. >>>>>> Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1835674 >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
