On 5/3/2019 4:59 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote: > On 03/05/19 22:48, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: >> I was just trying to find this discussion in the video, can you give >> the time? >> >> The link to the video is here, for the future generations of internet >> search engine users who find this thread: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRwTyBX2BFk >> >> > Around 4 minutes in. > > > And i think a single remark made towards the end of that answer spawned > this hellfire: > https://forum.kicad.info/t/more-fully-specified-symbol-library-discussion/16701 > (Fair warning the poster took a small remark way too seriously and > assumed that the fully specified symbol workflow might go away. Which i > do not belive was the intended message at all. The reason i even made > this post was that i knew that thread quite well and immediately > realized where the user got the ideas from just by hearing that answer. > I just wanted to give you guys my interpretation of the 2 or 3 possible > workflows as a possible reference and in part to ensure users that all > workflows are seen as equally viable depending on exact circumstance.) >
Feel free to engage this if you want to but please don't drag me into it. Honestly, I really don't care how users define their symbols or what work flow users prefer. KiCad places no restrictions on this regard nor do I plan to change that. I don't understood what the big deal is. Are they upset that we are not providing fully defined symbols? That's not even a reasonable request since there is no way to meet everyone's individual needs but that doesn't mean that they cannot do this. I really don't know what else can be said about this issue that hasn't been said over and over again. Wayne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp