As long as the only members of the lead development team have voting rights and the project leader has veto power than I am fine with this. I haven't had to use veto power yet but I am not naive enough to believe that there are no circumstances which I wouldn't veto a majority vote.
Cheers, Wayne On 4/21/19 4:03 PM, John Beard wrote: > +1 > > Reminds me of the scoring we used to do code review on Gerrit, with a > different threshold. That worked well. > > Is there a minimum time to wait for a -1? If a reviewer didn't see the > mail before three +1s, their veto is too late. But if they were checking > their mail earlier, the veto would count. Since KiCad is a > trans-continental team and core people can be busy in real life, slow > mail replies can happen. > > And also the etiquette for a "delay until I can review properly" veto. > If we want people to be free to exercise that ability in good faith > without feeling shy about blocking while they check it out, it should be > called out as allowed and encouraged. > > Cheers, > > John > > On 21 April 2019 20:34:23 BST, Tomasz Wlostowski > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 21/04/2019 18:08, Jeff Young wrote: > > In my last few years at Adobe I worked with Day Software in > Switzerland which we had just acquired. They did a lot of > open-source stuff with Apache and had this neat decision-making > scheme (which may have originated at Apache — I’m unaware of its > source): > > If you need direction on something, you send an email to the > list. (This part is no different than what we do today.) > > If someone agrees, they reply with “+1”. > > If someone wants to halt progress until either some discussion > is had or until another direction is chosen they veto with a “-1”. > > When you accumulate three +1s and are clear of -1s you’re good > to go. > > If you do get one or more -1s you’re blocked until those folks > change their input to either a “+0” or a “+1”. > > If you haven’t yet reached three +1s after a time-out period (I > think we used a week but it might have been two), but you are > clear of -1s, you can send a message to the list indicating a > default-consensus and go ahead and implement it. > > Might this be useful for us? > > +1. > > T. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
