Should we create a 5.1.0-rc2 milestone or should we just use 5.1.0 if we think something needs to be included?
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm going to tag 5.1.0-rc1 this evening after I get home from work. > There are still two low priority bugs against the 5.1.0-rc1 milestone > left which I'm going to let slide and try to get them fixed by the > stable release. Hopefully we wont need an -rc2. > > Unfortunately, this will break all of the linux distro package manager > version handling because of our previous policy of tagging ahead for the > next version. I apologize up front for the issues this is going to > cause. This decision falls squarely on my shoulders. > > The clock is ticking for the library, doc, and translation devs. I > would really like to get 5.1.0 released by the end of February. This > means the libraries, documentation, and translations would have to be > tagged for 5.1.0 around 2/23 to give our package devs some time to get > the packages built and uploaded to the website. Please let me know if > you cannot meet this date. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
