> On Aug 13, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Nhat Khai <nhatk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I may be wrong, but I feel embedded spice model with symbol library or .sch > file may be a wrong way. Instead treat spice model like footprint (using > spice syntax .cir file directly event better) to allow user directly modify > parameters passed into SUBCKT from GUI dialog like current Simulation GUI > right now. But if it done it right, I think it give user much more > flexibility, and more dynamic spice dialog that can covert all type of model > without adding more coding for KiCad. For example, read the "SUBCKT", and > allow user to change the value of parameters passed in of SUBCKT.
“Treat spice model like footprint.” And that’s why the model callout _should_ be embedded in the library symbol. If I place OPA1652AID onto my schematic, I want it to pull in the SOIC-8 footprint. CvPCB is to be avoided. For the same reason, why should I need to specify the SPICE model after placing a generic op-amp symbol on the board, when I can place an OPA1652 symbol and have it already know what model to use? -a _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
