Am Mo., 6. Aug. 2018 um 10:29 Uhr schrieb Wayne Stambaugh < stambau...@gmail.com>:
> Seth, > > On 8/6/2018 1:11 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > Am Mo., 6. Aug. 2018 um 09:57 Uhr schrieb Wayne Stambaugh > > <stambau...@gmail.com <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>>: > > > > Simon, > > > > On 8/6/2018 12:46 PM, Simon Richter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 06.08.2018 18:35, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > > > > >> What are people's opinions on adding an additional boost > > dependency? > > > > > > I would never have thought to say these words out loud, but in > > general I > > > prefer not reinventing the wheel. > > > > > > Another Boost dependency is vastly preferable to having a block of > > code > > > that only one or two people know how to maintain. > > > > > > Simon > > > > I tend to agree but Boost 1.67 which is the latest release and was > only > > release in April. I doubt 1.67 is widely availability except all but > > the latest distro releases so I'm sure there will be build issues if > we > > bump the minimum boost version to 1.67. > > > > Wayne > > > > Our minimum version is 1.54 right now. The RTree implementation has > > been stable > > ( > https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/libs/geometry/doc/html/geometry/spatial_indexes/introduction.html > ) > > since then as long as we avoid things like R* and bulk loading, which > > shouldn't be an issue for our use case. > > > > -S > > > > If this is the case, then I would think using boost would be the > preferred way to go. Just for clarification, is the boost rtree > implementation a header only boost library or does it require an > additional boost compiled library? > > Wayne > Hi Wayne- Header only, for our purposes. -Seth
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
