On 01/03/18 15:26, Bernhard Stegmaier wrote: > I didn’t follow in detail, but from what I saw I guess the bad thing about it > was to use OpenMP for > (1) parallelising for loop > and > (2) creating individual threads for progress reporter and workers. > > As soon as you don’t have OpenMP it didn’t work anymore… so maybe using > OpenMP for (1) and usual STL threading stuff for (2) would be a compromise > (even) if maybe clumsy. > At least, it would work also with non-OpenMP systems. > Sure, I'm all in for STL - my only concern is that zone filling, as it is done now, does not benefit at all from multiple CPU cores. We need a proper STL-based worker dispatcher for that to work.
Tom _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
