ki > On Feb 27, 2018, at 7:00 AM, Adam Wolf <adamw...@feelslikeburning.com> wrote: > > That's a pretty good idea. Let's plan on doing the same for the macOS > release installer, and only do the split installer for nightlies.
The macOS nightly disk images still include “old” libraries, most notably the various IC footprints are still called Housing_ instead of Package_. -a > > Adam > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Nick, >> >> You are probably correct about noob users. Our release installers >> should include everything. The nightly installers can be built without >> the libraries to cut down on build time and download bandwidth. >> >> Wayne >> >> On 2/26/2018 7:09 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >>> I have only been waiting for the release to be tagged such that I know >>> what strategy would be used for the libs. My plan is to make a full >>> installer and a lite installer for the nightlies. I am not sure if it >>> makes sense to have a seperate installer (without the main programs) >>> such that the noob user have to install the main app and then in a >>> seperate installer the rest of the stuff. >>> >>> 2018-02-26 20:39 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> We should remove or hide the optional items if they are no longer part >>> of the installer to prevent confusion. >>> >>> On 2/26/2018 12:46 PM, Jon Evans wrote: >>>> In the case that there is a separate installer for the libraries (which >>>> I also think makes sense), maybe those line items should be removed from >>>> the main installer instead of just disabled (if that is easy) to reduce >>>> confusion? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com> >>>> <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/26/2018 6:39 AM, Simon Richter wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On 25.02.2018 <tel:25.02.2018> 22 <tel:25.02.2018%2022>:52, Andrey >>> Kuznetsov wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The unchecked components in the image below cannot be checked. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, these are no longer in the nightly installer, because they are >>>>> 600MB compressed, and most nightly users maintain their libraries >>>>> themselves. >>>>> >>>>> Simon >>>>> >>>> >>>> Simon, >>>> >>>> Are there any plans to package the libraries as a separate installer? >>>> I'm sure there are some windows users are going to want to be able to >>>> install libraries directly rather than deal with git repos. First time >>>> users are going to be bewildered by an EDA tool that appears to offer no >>>> symbol, footprint and/or 3D model libraries. >>>> >>>> Wayne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
