Jorg, this has already been fixed and merged :) On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Jörg Hermann <joerg.herm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> The summary of this thread to me is: > > 1) Everybody is in favour of uniform, consistent measurement units, mm > that is. > 2) Everybody sees a long term benefit. > 3) Everybody agrees V5 is disruptive due to library changes. > 4) There seems to be consensus that only few users will be bitten by the > 3D offset change. > > Wayne disapproves the introduction of a version number. While I see the > benefit - data format is always crystal clear, it makes parsers more > complex all the time. From a maintenance pov I agree with Wayne, not > introducing a version number. > > One solution introduces a semantic change, where the presence or absence > of keywords conveys information. While we remember the absence today, > upcoming maintainers will curse at us for this decision in only a few month > time. > > So my plea is: Because of 1 - 4 this is now the best time to introduce the > 3D offset change! > Else this will bite all up to V6! > Please go forward! > > Jörg > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
