On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:38:00AM +0100, Clemens Koller wrote: > On 2017-12-15 11:01, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:54:01AM +0100, Clemens Koller wrote: > > > >> I was also considering the ellipsis '...' but in classical ASCII, they > >> are three characters wide, that's why I ended up with .., + or * to keep > >> it short. > > > > ... and the problem with 3 chars is? > > It takes more space in the schematics.
IMHO one more char (if not using Unicode...) is worth for being confusion proof... > >> But since we arrived in Unicode, this can be solved by using the > >> horizontal ellipsis single character: U+2026 '…' or in our case the > >> midline horizontal ellipsis U+22EF '⋯'. > > > > Please do _not_ use Unicode for this -please- > > What are the issues you expect? > Since these symbols are only used on display, I would not mind using them. Ok right, I was wrong, forget it. It's not a big issue anyway... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ------------------------ GNU/Linux User #78271 FSFE fellow #364 ------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
