On 27/11/17 21:18, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > On 11/27/2017 2:56 PM, jp charras wrote: >> Le 27/11/2017 à 20:18, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : >>> On 27/11/17 17:05, Henner Zeller wrote: >>>> Yes, I know about the time_t being different type situation, >>> >>> Why not just use uint64_t instead of time_t? It's identical on every >>> platform. >>> >>> Tom >>> >> >> Looks good to me. >> >> > > Will this cause issues on platforms where time_t is 32 bits? > These platforms have a serious issue anyway if they'll live long enough to reach year 2038 ;-)
IIRC the timestamp is just an unique ID of the item in Kicad, right? It's never propagated to the system time, so 64-bits IMHO 64-bits should be safe everywhere. Tom _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
