Le 19/11/2017 à 16:18, Heikki Pulkkinen a écrit : > Hi, > > You can dowload it from: > > https://forum.kicad.info/t/testbench-board-for-kicad/1127 > > I do some more test, and found that new algo would be very fast with my > parallell zone filling algo, > but it get stuck after filled all 128 pours below 10 seconds and started to > removing insulated > areas. Other boards just works fine. Maybe it is too good to be true to get > results like that. > > Rgards > > Heikki >
I made a test with this board (on W7 32 bits): Refill zones: stable version: 10s master (current) version: 3m but there are less unconnected items in master version (and the master version ran out of memory once) I am not sure this board was made with Kicad. > > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 19/11/17 15:35, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > Sorry to tell that, but it seems that new connectivity algorithm is slow > > with bigger boards. Doing some tests I noticed that new algo is > > speeding recalculating ratsnest, but it costs manual routing and > > dragging performance. This video shows how big difference is. And that > > board is just nothing big. > > > > Zones filling, that was really big difference. Old algo below 3 mins. > > New one almost 17 minutes. Old algo, has my parallelism algo in zone > > filling, but it is doing it twice, with 2 core processor, and most of > > the time it is calculating ratsnest before and after filling. > > > > > > > Heikki, > > Can you send us (privately) the board that shows the drops in > performance? I'd greatly like to optimize it, with your help if possible! > > Best, > Tom > > PS. What's the CPU/RAM of your PC? > -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
