On 23.02.2017 14:17, Chris Pavlina wrote: > boost::coroutine? Seems the latter has a much more stable API, is > it missing something we require?
Hi Chris, I can't agree that either boost::context or boost::coroutine have stable APIs, that's why have our own wrapper on top... Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
