Moving this to a new thread. > On 8/2/2016 7:16 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > My implementation had a large number of symbols, would have allowed > > user-supplied arbitrary symbols if I had finished it, and automatically > > selected a symbol based on net name _exactly_ as Clemens suggested. All > > of these issues are solved. > > How difficult would it be to apply the same selection criteria for power > symbols? The more you explain what you have done with power label the > more it seems like you could have done the same thing with power > symbols. This would save implementing a new object and the file > formatting to support it. Maybe I'm missing something here but I just > don't see how a new label type that looks like a power symbol is > different from a power symbol that already provides the same functionality.
It provides the same functionality. I just think it's more consistent from the user's perspective - see my comment earlier about them /being/ labels, functionally speaking - and not that much more trouble to implement. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
