Hi Adam, I was doing a bit of research and found this:
https://github.com/caskroom/homebrew-versions/blob/master/Casks/kicad-nightly.rb I believe it's only pulling down the binaries, and not the libraries (that's the kicad-extras package, right?). I think that's fine, the idea being that if you're using homebrew you probably have internet access, but we could probably also create a kicad-extras package as well. There's also already a kicad cask, but it points to the old stable, and I'm not sure what the official process is for upgrading that. I can look into that tomorrow, though I suspect it might be as simple as a pull request. Not sure we want to change that until we have an RC build. I'm not sure if a non-changing URL is necessary or not, it might be better to have versioned URLs and just push changes to the caskroom/homebrew-cask repository when a new release is up. And as far as the new human goes, my in-laws are in town for the week and I'm making liberal use of their baby holding abilities :). Besides, it's hard to sleep when it's light out and I've just downed a few shots of espresso because the baby didn't sleep all night... -Ian On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM Adam Wolf <adamw...@feelslikeburning.com> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I think the homebrew cask can point at a dmg on the web, and us packaging > folk have already been discussing implementing a non-changing URL redirect > that points you to the latest build on your platform. > > If you find out homebrew cask can pull from a dmg via HTTP (htttps...), > let me know and I will promote the stable url in my todo list. > > Get some sleep and don't put KiCad too high on your to-do list; new humans > are pretty cool and so are the people that make them! > > Adam Wolf > Cofounder and Engineer > Wayne and Layne > On Sep 7, 2015 3:14 PM, "Ian Woloschin" <i...@woloschin.com> wrote: > >> Haha, no worries. I'm juggling my phone/laptop and newborn daughter, so >> if my emails are gibberish I blame a flailing newborn limb. Or lack of >> sleep. On the plus side, 2 weeks of paternity leave, and as long as the >> baby is sleeping I need something to keep me busy! >> >> I'll start off trying to do a homebrew cask first, I think that should be >> a bit easier, and probably far more popular. I don't know how easy it >> would be to keep it updated (...maybe the build script could generate new >> casks?) but I suspect we could easily keep it updated for tagged releases. >> I've also got a Funtoo Linux desktop at home, so I'd like to make sure >> there's at least an overlay (like a PPA) of up-to-date RC/Stable builds. >> Of course, most folks running a source based distro should be ok compiling >> a project from source... :) >> >> I suspect it'll take me a few days to make some progress, but I suspect >> it'll take a couple of days for a RC build to be posted anyways. >> >> -Ian >> >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:19 PM Adam Wolf <adamw...@feelslikeburning.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Ha! That's what I get for not refreshing my email client before hitting >>> send... >>> On Sep 7, 2015 11:18 AM, "Adam Wolf" <adamw...@feelslikeburning.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I think there already is a homebrew recipe. >>>> >>>> It would be nice if someone would make a homebrew cask recipe for my >>>> nightly OS X builds... ;) >>>> >>>> Adam Wolf >>>> On Sep 7, 2015 10:07 AM, "Ian Woloschin" <i...@woloschin.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> User here. I'd be happy to try and release a Gentoo ebuild in an >>>>> overlay, but I'd want an RC first, versus live ebuilds, which kind of >>>>> suck, >>>>> since I believe they force a fresh build for every source update. I'd >>>>> also be somewhat curious about trying to do a homebrew package for OS X, >>>>> but from lurking on this list I suspect there's already some folks who >>>>> might know how to do that already, but if not I'm happy to give it a shot. >>>>> >>>>> -Ian >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:29 AM Nick Østergaard <oe.n...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Indeed. Also by making an release candidate might motivate packagers >>>>>> to prepare packages for their system, and then we can catch some >>>>>> potential problems, and possible get some input to address them for >>>>>> the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-09-07 14:33 GMT+02:00 Chris Pavlina <pavlina.ch...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> > I second this. Just make the branch! The bugs keep piling in >>>>>> anyway, and >>>>>> > most of them are minor - barely reproducible. We're as ready as >>>>>> we'll ever >>>>>> > be! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Sep 7, 2015 6:00 AM, "Brian Sidebotham" < >>>>>> brian.sidebot...@gmail.com> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> My humble suggestion is to just create the RC1 branch now because >>>>>> I've >>>>>> >> been through all of those bugs, and they're all either incomplete >>>>>> or >>>>>> >> not repeatable for me. In which case we need more information in >>>>>> order >>>>>> >> to be able to fix them. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> In order to get more information, it's better to have a larger >>>>>> >> user-base. Plus, a user-base on a pre-built rc candidate. It's >>>>>> >> possible for example that some people's systems are a bit screwy >>>>>> when >>>>>> >> building and so we're really chasing phantoms that are down to >>>>>> their >>>>>> >> specific build. With an RC we're at least debugging a single sane >>>>>> >> thing. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> That's what an RC is for in my opinion - it has known issues, but >>>>>> we >>>>>> >> need help moving forward. Plus, these issues will become >>>>>> insignificant >>>>>> >> compared the waft of new bugs that are going to come out of the >>>>>> >> woodwork when we make an RC build for mass people to test. I don't >>>>>> >> think that work should be delayed for a few bugs that are almost >>>>>> >> unrepeatable. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I have a patch holding for adding the interactive routing options >>>>>> to >>>>>> >> the draw toolbar. It makes no sense to me for those brilliant >>>>>> tools to >>>>>> >> be available only in a menu option - they should be in the draw >>>>>> >> toolbar and disabled when in legacy canvas mode so people know what >>>>>> >> they're missing out on! ;) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Sorry, I've only just managed to get some time together to be able >>>>>> to >>>>>> >> work on KiCad again, so bad timing! >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Best Regards, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Brian. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On 6 September 2015 at 21:11, Wayne Stambaugh < >>>>>> stambau...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> > This is a reminder to *all* developers, please do not send any >>>>>> patches >>>>>> >> > or merge requests unless it is specifically to fix an existing >>>>>> bug >>>>>> >> > report. Also, please don't bother fixing the build scripts or >>>>>> any of >>>>>> >> > the CMake dependency library build code as they will be removed >>>>>> during >>>>>> >> > the next development cycle. My preference is that we focus on >>>>>> the >>>>>> >> > critical bug reports that are keeping me from creating an rc1 >>>>>> branch. >>>>>> >> > They can be found here: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.importance%3Alist=CRITICAL&field.importance%3Alist=HIGH&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > This list needs to get to zero before I'm willing to create any >>>>>> rc1 >>>>>> >> > branch. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Thank you for your cooperation. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Wayne >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> >> > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>>> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>>> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>>> >>>>>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp