Second the vote for consistency, no matter which way it goes. Personally, I have a slight preference for "footprint" over "module" as well.
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:56 +1100, Mitch Davis wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Mark Roszko <mark.ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hehe, well, I guess everything can be renamed in the opposite > > direction. But consistency is needed. > > YES PLEASE! A number of people I've spoken to were really confused by > this inconsistency. > > I use footprint myself. Though footprint seems to imply what a PCB > must have in order to accommodate a part, eg, pads, silk. Are the 3d > models part of this? If they are, then footprint might not be the > best term. > > Mitch. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Andrew Zonenberg PhD student, security group Computer Science Department Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute http://colossus.cs.rpi.edu/~azonenberg/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
