On 06/05/14 21:47, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
That said, I think that *if* the sexp reader can traverse automatically a generic sexp (without having a grammar, only tokenising) we could decide that it could 'skip' each subexpression starting with an unknown token. Maybe with warnings:D
I would have thought this would exactly be done at the end of tokenisation - this is when the current parser says "erk, i expected one of 'fp_line', 'pad', ...., I give up now, no footprint for you". Instead, what it could do is go, "hmm, don't know what this is, I'll keep this bit - up to the matching paren - for later in case we save it back, and move on".
Cheers, John _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
