13/01/14 10:04, Maciej Sumiński kirjoitti: > I fully support the idea, in fact I have dreamed about this too > (http://www.ohwr.org/projects/cern-kicad/wiki/ratsnest-gal#Possible-upgrades). > I had a short try with OpenMP, but I did not get any better results, so > it seems that I could have done it wrong.
Some articles: http://locklessinc.com/articles/vectorize/ http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorizathttps://twiki.cern.ch https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/WorkBookWritingAutovectorizableCode Some tools: http://code.entropywave.com/blog/ http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/Volk ORC may be the best tool to go with. GNU Radio's DSP stack and GStreamer depends on it. > If there are volunteers who have some experience with parallelization I > am very eager to cooperate to speed up some of computations. The > ratsnest algorithm is a perfect place to start with. It is performed on > per net basis, so they are all independent to each other. I could possibly do something, but I'm not familiar with much of the Kicad code. Single function "optimise this ->" might work, but delivery times can't be guaranteed... -Vesa _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
