On 04/11/2013 09:18 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:01:33AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >> I am happy using the same names in the UI that end up going into the >> board file. Achieving familiarity with those names have value. > > Then rip out the whole renaming facility.
Layer naming is fine as is. If someone commits a change to layer naming without first getting agreement from me, then I will revoke his commit privileges. Hopefully this bring sufficient clarification at this time. Except for 'special' layer > (mask, silk, paste and edges) there is no real reason to constrain layer > name. Especially the ECO1 and ECO2 which have no meaning in > theirselves... > > As for the front/top/whatever issue it's moot, everyone would like > his/her own name but, at the same time everyone would recognize it > anyway. So for that I agree that is best to stick with the current one. > > Another thing... the names would be localized anyway, while the file > remains with the english symbols :D > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
