On 08/06/25 at 05:26pm, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 10:22:31PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > Hello Baoqua,
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 14:23:33 +0800 Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Now everything is ready, set kasan=off can disable kasan for all
> > > three modes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/kasan-enabled.h | 11 +----------
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h b/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h
> > > index 32f2d19f599f..b5857e15ef14 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h
> > > @@ -8,30 +8,21 @@ extern bool kasan_arg_disabled;
> > >
> > > DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kasan_flag_enabled);
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> > > -
> > > static __always_inline bool kasan_enabled(void)
> > > {
> > > return static_branch_likely(&kasan_flag_enabled);
> > > }
> >
> > I found mm-new build fails when CONFIG_KASAN is unset as below, and 'git
> > bisect' points this patch.
>
> Yup just hit this + bisected here.
Sorry for the trouble and thanks for reporting.
>
> >
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > ld: lib/stackdepot.o:(__jump_table+0x8): undefined reference to
> > `kasan_flag_enabled'
> >
> > Since kasna_flag_enabled is defined in mm/kasan/common.c, I confirmed diff
> > like
> > below fixes this. I think it may not be a correct fix though, since I
> > didn't
> > read this patchset thoroughly.
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h b/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h
> > index b5857e15ef14..a53d112b1020 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kasan-enabled.h
> > @@ -8,11 +8,22 @@ extern bool kasan_arg_disabled;
> >
> > DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kasan_flag_enabled);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > +
>
> Shouldn't we put this above the static key declaration?
>
> Feels like the whole header should be included really.
You are right, kasan_flag_enabled should be included in CONFIG_KASAN
ifdeffery scope.
Since CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS depends on CONFIG_KASAN, we may not need
include below CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS ifdeffery into CONFIG_KASAN ifdeffery
scope. Not sure if this is incorrect.
Thanks a lot for checking this.
>
> > static __always_inline bool kasan_enabled(void)
> > {
> > return static_branch_likely(&kasan_flag_enabled);
> > }
> >
> > +#else /* CONFIG_KASAN */
> > +
> > +static inline bool kasan_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> > static inline bool kasan_hw_tags_enabled(void)
> > {
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > SJ
> >
>
> Cheers, Lorenzo
>
