On Fri, Aug 08 2025, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > [...] > > > [ 59.011407][ T1] INFO: trying to register non-static key. > [ 59.011783][ T1] The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe > [ 59.011783][ T1] you didn't initialize this object before use? > [ 59.011783][ T1] turning off the locking correctness validator. > [ 59.011783][ T1] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G > T 6.16.0-rc5-00079-gb753522bed0b #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) > [ 59.011783][ T1] Tainted: [T]=RANDSTRUCT > [ 59.011783][ T1] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), > BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 > [ 59.011783][ T1] Call Trace:
Pasha, I think your patch [0] fixes this. Perhaps it is a good idea for it to land independent of the LUO patches, since those are likely to take some more time? [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250807014442.3829950-2-pasha.tatas...@soleen.com/ > [ 59.011783][ T1] <TASK> > [ 59.011783][ T1] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) > [ 59.011783][ T1] assign_lock_key (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:988) > [ 59.011783][ T1] register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) > [ 59.011783][ T1] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) > [ 59.011783][ T1] lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5871) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? xa_load_or_alloc (include/linux/xarray.h:699 > kernel/kexec_handover.c:106) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_preempt_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:412) > [ 59.011783][ T1] _raw_spin_lock (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 > kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? xa_load_or_alloc (include/linux/xarray.h:699 > kernel/kexec_handover.c:106) > [ 59.011783][ T1] xa_load_or_alloc (include/linux/xarray.h:699 > kernel/kexec_handover.c:106) > [ 59.011783][ T1] __kho_preserve_order (kernel/kexec_handover.c:156) > [ 59.011783][ T1] kho_test_init (lib/test_kho.c:84) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kho_test_init (lib/test_kho.c:271) > [ 59.011783][ T1] do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1274) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kho_test_init (lib/test_kho.c:271) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? kasan_save_track (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:25 > mm/kasan/common.c:60 mm/kasan/common.c:69) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? kasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:48 > mm/kasan/common.c:68) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __kasan_kmalloc (mm/kasan/common.c:398) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:412) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? do_initcalls (include/linux/slab.h:909 > include/linux/slab.h:1039 init/main.c:1345) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1588) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_on (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:452) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:412) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_on (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:452) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:311) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? next_arg (lib/cmdline.c:273) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? parameq (kernel/params.c:91) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? parse_args (kernel/params.c:?) > [ 59.011783][ T1] do_initcall_level (init/main.c:1335) > [ 59.011783][ T1] do_initcalls (init/main.c:1349) > [ 59.011783][ T1] kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1588) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kernel_init (init/main.c:1466) > [ 59.011783][ T1] kernel_init (init/main.c:1476) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kernel_init (init/main.c:1466) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:154) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kernel_init (init/main.c:1466) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:255) > [ 59.011783][ T1] </TASK> -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav
