On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:43:53 -0800 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:12:27 +0800 Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 01/13/25 at 12:01pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:49:30PM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote: > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > This is a repost of the patch "kexec_core: Accept unaccepted kexec > > > > destination addresses" [1], rebased to v6.13-rc2. > > > > > > Can we get this patch applied? > > > > This looks good to me. In v1, we have analyzed all other possible > > solutions, however change in this patch seems the simplest and most > > accepatable one. > > > > If Eric has no objection, maybe Andrew can help pick this into his tree. > > OK, but that patch is the only thing in the world which is older than me. > > Yan, can you please refresh, retest and resend? > > Also, please consolidate the changelogging into a single email - > a single-patch series with a coverletter is just weird. > > Putting the [0/n] info into the singleton patch's changelog is more > reader-friendly, and that's what counts, no? Oh, I remember this patch. Eric, your feedback has been unusably-by-me enigmatic :( In fact the whole multi-month review discussion has been quite indecisive. Yan, please go back through the discussion and incorporate reviewer feedback into the changelogs: describe the possible issues which people have raised and your responses to those. Then resend and then let us restart the review process. With less reviewer latency please!
