(CC'ing kexec-ML)
Hello Hemanth,
>Hi 'makedumpfile' utility developers,
>
>I'm using version 1.5.6 and I see that we can optimize the utility using this
>patch:
>
>--- makedumpfile-1.5.6/makedumpfile.c 2014-04-20 18:59:18.000000000 -0700
>+++ makedumpfile-1.5.6-changed/makedumpfile.c 2016-04-11 18:47:50.019563738
>-0700
>@@ -6475,6 +6475,15 @@
>
> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
>
>+ /*
>+ * There's no point in checking other pages if we've already
>dumped
>+ * all the pages that are dumpable
>+ */
>+ if (num_dumped == info->num_dumpable) {
>+ ret = TRUE;
>+ goto out;
>+ }
>+
> if ((num_dumped % per) == 0)
> print_progress(PROGRESS_COPY, num_dumped,
> info->num_dumpable);
>
>Why are we looping even after we are done with all the dumpable pages to start
>with?
>I'm concerned if I'm missing something with this patch.
You are right, it's better to break the loop after the last dumpable page
is written. I neglected that since the remains of loop just check the
bitmap and call continue, I thought the wasteful processing cost is little.
I'm curious to know how much does this patch improve the performance.
Thanks,
Atsushi Kumagai
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
